Trout Lake, British Columbia 50.58° N · 117.42° W Updated 24 August 2026

Save Rady Creek

The Government of British Columbia refused to fund this road for a decade, refused it
the designation that would have protected it, and now says it is too dangerous to keep.
The excavators are booked for this month. The public was never asked.

RoadTrout Lake–Rady Creek FSR 0321.02
To be destroyed4,376 m · 79 waypoints
ScheduledAugust 2026
Public comment periodNone
Still standingAs of 24 Aug 2026

The Government of British Columbia has given four reasons for destroying this road.
Its own documents contradict every one of them.

Reason 01
“The road is a landslide hazard.”
Their own surveyor wrote “Can drive pickup to here” on the published map. The hazard report has never been released.
Reason 02
“There’s no money to maintain it.”
The Province funded 14% of what its own districts asked for. The Auditor General found that removal was optional.
Reason 03
“The public was already consulted.”
There is no comment period on record for this road. The same district office ran a full one four kilometres away.
Reason 04
“This is about caribou recovery.”
The operator flying this ridge was told to hand over its flight data. It refused for years, and kept flying and lobbying.

The excavators are booked for this month — to proceed without public consultation. We are asking for a pause, because this government did not follow its own process and decided behind closed doors.

Every record we hold is published on this page — the emails, the briefing notes, the government’s own numbers.  Let’s get into it ↓

01 — The road

What is about to be destroyed

Rady Creek is a single-lane road that leaves Highway 31 east of Trout Lake and climbs. In under an hour it lifts you from the valley floor to fifteen hundred metres of alpine on Silvercup Ridge. There is nothing else like it in the Kootenays.

Miners cut the first grade here more than a century ago to reach the Silver Cup mine, which pulled roughly a million and a half ounces of silver out of this mountain between 1895 and 1915. The ore ran out and the town emptied — a thousand people in 1897, seven by 1959. The road stayed, and people kept using it.

Today it carries dirt bikes, ATVs, mountain bikers, hikers and horseback riders through the summer. In winter it is the primary safe route into the riding area locals call Foggy Day. It reaches some of the oldest active mineral claims in the province. And it serves what is left of Trout Lake — a community whose three remaining industries are tourism, mineral exploration and recreation. All three go up this road.

It is also the middle of only three ways onto Silvercup Ridge. An old miner-built pack trail runs the length of that ridge. Take out the centre access and anyone in trouble up there has to reach one of the far ends, or wait for a helicopter.

SILVERCUP RIDGE historic pack trail runs the full crest · registered trail #2372 HIGHWAY 31 TROUT LAKE ↤ lake continues lake continues ↦ Trout Lake village West access remains open RADY CREEK FSR 0321.02 East access remains open 4,376 m scheduled for removal the upper road, and 300 m of the registered ridge trail egress west egress east approx. 5 km SCHEMATIC PLAN VIEW · not to survey accuracy
Rady Creek is the central of three routes onto Silvercup Ridge, and the only one scheduled for removal. Remove it and anyone in difficulty on the crest must travel the full length of the ridge to reach the west or east access, or wait for a helicopter. Photographs wanted: if you have images of this road — any season, any year — send them to contact@saverady.com with the date and your name for credit.

Valley floor to alpine in under an hour

4,376 m TO BE DESTROYED Hwy 31 · ~700 m switchbacks WP74 — end of the work “Can drive pickup to here” SILVERCUP RIDGE · ~2,000 m
Schematic elevation profile. The section inside the dashed box is what the Province intends to remove — the upper 4,376 metres, including 300 metres of the registered Silver Cup Ridge Trail.
The Ministry of Forests says this road has to go. Over five years it has given four reasons: public safety, funding, caribou habitat, and the end of logging. The reasons change depending on who asks. The documents do not.
02 — The money

They stopped paying, then called it a hazard

In November 2020 the Auditor General of British Columbia audited how the Province manages its forest service roads. The conclusion was that the Ministry was not maintaining them to its own policies — and the audit explains exactly why.

Every year the natural resource districts — the people on the ground who inspect these roads and know what they need — submit maintenance budget requests. Every year the Engineering Branch funds a sliver of them.

Then narrow it to this region. The South Area, which contains the Selkirk district and Trout Lake, asked for $4.5 million for its priority roads in 2019/20 and received $1.7 million. The single largest slice of what it asked for was recreation access.

The record-keeping was worse than the money. Of eight districts the auditors sampled, seven kept no historical inspection data. Two kept no maintenance records at all. An internal ministry audit had found the same failures in 2008 — twelve years earlier. Nothing had changed in between.

10 20 30 40 0 $ millions — requested by districts vs. allocated $28.6M$5.6M 2017/1820% $39.0M$5.7M 2018/1915% $40.2M$5.5M 2019/2014%
Requested by districtsAllocated by Engineering Branch
Auditor General of BC, Exhibit 8. Requests rose 41% in three years. The allocation never moved.
REQUESTED $0.3M $1.1M rural residence $3.1M — HIGH-VALUE RECREATION $4.5M ALLOCATED $1.7M 36% of what this region asked for $0$4.5M
Auditor General of BC, Exhibit 9. Recreation access was 69% of this region's entire capital-road request for the year.

What this means

The deterioration the Ministry now cites as grounds for destroying this road is the direct, predictable result of a decade of its own funding decisions. It defunded the road, kept no record of the consequences, and is presenting those consequences as an act of nature.

But underfunding alone does not explain Rady Creek. There was one mechanism that could have protected this road, and it was never used. Understanding why is the centre of this story.
03 — The switch

One decision sealed it

The Ministry's funding policy ranks maintenance money in three tiers. First, roads serving communities of fifty or more year-round residents. Second, roads serving rural residences. Third — and this is the one that matters — high-value recreation sites, as designated by the Recreation Sites and Trails BC representative.

Roads that clear any tier become what the Ministry calls capital roads. The Auditor General describes capital roads as unlikely to be deactivated, and as requiring continual maintenance. About twelve thousand kilometres of road in this province carry that protection.

Trout Lake has around two dozen residents. Nobody lives on Rady Creek. Tiers one and two were never available. Tier three was the only door — and it swings on a single administrative decision by a single agency.

In 2017, the Trout Lake Recreational Club went to that exact agency and did everything right. They asked Recreation Sites and Trails BC to make their riding areas official. RSTBC sent a mapping team. The club handed over its list of trails. RSTBC made them trailhead signs — the first of the new-style signs issued anywhere in the province. A member drove to Nelson to collect them and volunteers put them up at a work bee.

Four years later, when the Rady deactivation was circulated for comment, Recreation Sites and Trails BC filed no concern.

They decided it wasn't a high recreation value place. We just weren't important.
Trout Lake Recreational Club member, speaking on camera, August 2026
STEP 01 RSTBC files no concern STEP 02 No recreation designation not a capital road STEP 03 Maintenance funding denied region receives 36% STEP 04 Condition degrades no records kept STEP 05 Decay becomes the safety case the road is removed, never reassessed Maintenance funding priority order: 1. communities of 50+ 2. rural residences 3. high-value recreation ← the only door open to Rady The Auditor General: capital roads are “unlikely to be deactivated” and require continual maintenance.

What this means

The club walked into the one agency that could have saved this road, registered its trails, and was handed signage for its trouble. When it counted, that agency said nothing. A single unrecorded silence — not a hazard, not a budget line, not a caribou — removed the last protection this road had.

With the funding door shut, the Ministry needed a reason to finish the job. It found one in an engineer's opinion it has never published.
04 — The hazard

The landslide nobody can see

The newest reason for removing Rady Creek is that an engineer in the Nelson office has identified it as a landslide hazard requiring removal for public safety.

No terrain stability assessment has been published. No geotechnical report. No hydrology report. The petitioners say none has ever been disclosed to them. The engineer has never been named.

What has been published is the deactivation prescription itself, produced on 7 November 2025 and available to anyone on the Ministry's own website. It lists 79 waypoints across 4,376 metres, each flagged in the field with ribbon and orange paint.

Seventy-five of those waypoints prescribe cross-ditches, fill pull-backs and water bars — work a grader could reverse in a week. Four prescribe full re-contour, which nothing reverses.

And at waypoint 74 — the top of the work, the furthest point the excavators will reach — the Ministry's own surveyor wrote a note that appears on the published map.

“Can drive pickup to here.”
Annotation by the Ministry surveyor at waypoint 74 · Deactivation Prescription Map, FSR 0321.02, 7 November 2025
0 m4,376 m WP74 · 4,376 m · end of the work “Can drive pickup to here”
Cross ditch — reversible Pull back fill — reversible Water bar — reversible Full re-contour — permanent
Spacing schematic; treatment types and the four re-contour waypoints are taken from the published prescription map dated 7 November 2025.

What each treatment actually does

CROSS DITCH · REVERSIBLE BENCH INTACT ditch A trench cut across the running surface to shed water. Fill it, grade it, and the road is back. PULL BACK FILL · REVERSIBLE NARROWED outer half pushed over Half the running surface shoved over the edge. Narrow and rough, but the bench survives. FULL RE-CONTOUR · PERMANENT WAS THE ROAD NO SHELF LEFT The cut face is driven down into the bench until the hillside runs unbroken. Nothing left to rebuild on.
Cross-sections through the hillside, looking along the road. A forest service road on a sidehill is a bench — material cut out of the uphill face and packed onto the downhill side to make a shelf. Cross-ditching and pull-back damage the surface but leave that shelf in place. Re-contouring drives the cut face down into the bench until the hillside runs unbroken and the shelf no longer exists. Only four of the seventy-nine waypoints call for it — which is why the timing of a pause matters more than the outcome of an argument.
NOTICE This road is proposed to be deactivated and will not be accessible to vehicles after AUGUST 2026 THE CONSULTATION
The public notice, five switchbacks up. Alongside a map and a data file on a government webpage, this is the entire public process on record.
THE FIELD MARKING Orange cross ditch · 75 of 79 Yellow & black pull back fill Pink water bar Red on the map = re-contour · 4 of 79 · permanent
Every waypoint was flagged in the field with ribbon and paint. Orange for cross ditch, yellow and black for pull-back, pink for water bar — the Ministry's own legend.
THE WINDOW 75 of 79 waypoints reversible with a grader 4 waypoints permanent — nothing undoes re-contour Which is why the timing of a pause matters more than the outcome of an argument.
Almost all of this work could be undone — until the excavators reach the four re-contour waypoints. After that there is no bench left to rebuild from.

What this means

A government that will not release its safety evidence has published a map on which its own surveyor recorded that you can drive a pickup to the top of the section it calls too dangerous to keep. And the treatment prescribed for that catastrophic hazard is, at seventy-five of seventy-nine waypoints, a drainage ditch.

If the safety case were solid, it would have survived contact with the public. The Ministry made sure it never had to.
05 — The silence

Four kilometres away, they ran a real process

The Incomappleux River road sits in the same valley, in the same district, under the same District Manager, on the same timeline. When the Ministry decided to remove that one, this is what it did.

It published a fifteen-question public FAQ with a file number on every page. It mailed notices to landowners and interested parties in 2021, then again in 2023, then again in 2024. It advertised the draft plans in the local paper. It opened a formal public comment period, ran it, closed it, and committed on the record to reviewing every submission before proceeding.

For Rady Creek: none of it. A map and a data file posted to a webpage last November, and a sign on a switchback.

The Trout Lake Recreational Club and Arrow Lakes Ridge Riders argue the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation requires public review and comment, and supporting assessments, before a decision like this. We have found no record that either happened here — and we have asked.

INCOMAPPLEUX FSR 3397 RADY CREEK FSR 0321.02 public FAQ mailed notice ×3 years newspaper advertisement public comment period draft prescriptions none none none none map + data file the Ministry set its own standard here — then declined to apply it below same district office · same decision-maker · same years

What this means

The Ministry cannot argue it did not know what proper consultation looks like. It ran one four kilometres away and documented every step. The difference between these two roads is not procedure. It is that one had residents with property titles, and the other had recreational users with nothing to sue over.

There is one more thing the record shows about who this government listens to. It is a matter of public registry, and it is not close.
06 — The room

Who has been in the room

British Columbia keeps a public lobbyist registry. Every registered contact between a lobbyist and a senior public official is filed, dated, numbered and searchable by anyone. It takes ten minutes to learn to use, and nobody in this fight had looked.

Directly behind Silvercup Ridge sits Galena Lodge, operated by Canadian Mountain Holidays, which holds roughly three million hectares of commercial recreation tenure across British Columbia — tenure issued by the Ministry of Forests. The industry association for heli-skiing and cat-skiing is HeliCat Canada, and it retains professional lobbyists.

Those 162 filings are not history. Between December 2025 and July 2026, HeliCat's registered contacts include near-monthly meetings with the Director and a policy specialist of the provincial Wildlife Branch — the officials who run the caribou file that has been used to close this terrain. It reached two deputy ministers repeatedly across May, June and July of this year. It reached the Deputy Minister to the Premier. It reached the Minister of Environment and Parks directly.

In the same period, the people who use Rady Creek wrote letters. Steve Shannon's petition, which he believes passed ten thousand signatures, went to the Minister of Forests and got nothing back. When seventy people gathered at Trout Lake in July and invited the Ministry, it sent natural resource officers — who told the crowd they were not permitted past the barricade.

HeliCat Canada Association 162 Adventure Tourism Coalition of BC 22 Outdoor Recreation Council of BC 15 Yellowstone to Yukon 11 Guide Outfitters Association of BC 6 Commercial Bear Viewing Association 3 BC Snowmobile Federation 1 — May 2020, six years ago ATVBC / Quad Riders 0 Four Wheel Drive Association of BC 0 Trout Lake Recreational Club 0
Total registered lobbying activity reports, BC Office of the Registrar of Lobbying, retrieved 24 August 2026. Every entry is public and citable by activity number.
2 4 6 8 JULAUGSEPOCT NOVDECJANFEB MARAPRMAYJUN JUL 20252026 Thirteen consecutive months. Not one at zero.
Derived from the fifty most recent filings retrieved from the registry.

What this means

Access to public land in this province is being decided in rooms that recreational users have never been in. One industry association has more registered meetings with this government in thirteen months than every motorised recreation group in British Columbia has had in a decade. That is not a coincidence of scale. It is what a closed process produces.

The registry records that those meetings happened. It does not record what was said in them.
For that, there are the documents.
Put the six sections together and the shape of this is not ambiguous. None of it was necessary.
07 — The file

What the documents say

The lobbying registry shows that the meetings happened. It does not show what was said in them. So we filed for the records behind the registry entries.

Three freedom-of-information packages came back — 108 pages, covering the same years. They are heli-ski tenure files: six Licences of Occupation under review, caribou conditions, GPS flight data, tenure term. Every page is published below, and every exhibit links to the original release on the Province's own open information portal.

Read together they show what the registry cannot. Through the years either side of this decision, the commercial operator flying Silvercup Ridge was telling the Ministry of Forests in writing — to the officials deciding its licences — that public recreation on that ridge was a problem for its business.

Highlighting is ours. Everything else is as released.

One rule for industry. Another for the helicopters.

Meeting note prepared for the Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, 16 May 2024, ahead of a meeting with the CEO of HeliCat Canada and the VP of Sustainability at Canadian Mountain Holidays.

EXHIBIT 01

WLR-2024-41783 · Meeting note for Hon. Nathan Cullen · 16 May 2024

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from WLR-2024-41783 · Meeting note for Hon. Nathan Cullen · 16 May 2024

What the Province requires of everyone else

Mining and forestry must observe timing windows and setback distances, and must supply detailed spatial data on their operations. In the same note, four bullets later, data from heli-tourism operators is to be provided on a voluntary basis.

EXHIBIT 02

WLR-2024-41783 · page 2 · 16 May 2024

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from WLR-2024-41783 · page 2 · 16 May 2024

Years of asking. No data.

The Province records that it has sought flight path data for several years and that HeliCat has not provided it — while some individual operators have. The association’s stated objections: the data might become public, the industry is being unfairly targeted, and there is no clear plan for its use. The same page notes limited evidence that operators comply with the recommended two-kilometre setback from caribou.

EXHIBIT 03

FOR-2023-31284 · Briefing Note for Decision · 1 Feb 2021

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31284 · Briefing Note for Decision · 1 Feb 2021

The Ministry says so itself

Forestry and mining took steps to support caribou recovery. The briefing note states plainly that the lack of similar improvements from the adventure tourism sector diminishes the credibility of the Province’s own recovery efforts. Prepared for Deputy Minister John Allan, three weeks before the Trout Lake clubs signed their stewardship agreement.

EXHIBIT 04

FOR-2023-31284 · same note · authored by Michelle Porter and Darcy Peel

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31284 · same note · authored by Michelle Porter and Darcy Peel

And expects to be lobbied over it

The Ministry writes that HeliCat Canada has historically resisted requests to voluntarily supply GPS flight data and may resume lobbying efforts to block these changes. This is the government anticipating, in a decision document, that an industry association will lobby against a caribou measure.

The ridge, named, in the operator's own words

CMH Galena Heli-ski Management Plan, 15 July 2020 — filed with the Ministry in support of a request to replace Licence of Occupation #340826 for a further 45-year term. The tenure covers 1,167 square kilometres. Silvercup Ridge is one of its thirteen ski zones.

EXHIBIT 05

FOR-2023-31283 · CMH Galena Management Plan · zone description · 15 July 2020

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31283 · CMH Galena Management Plan · zone description · 15 July 2020

Silvercup Ridge, by name

In the description of its Silver Cup zone, the operator records that the runs are “becoming increasingly affected by (and less useable as a result of) unregulated snowmobile use from Trout Lake.” The town is named. The ridge is named. The document is dated eight months before the Trout Lake clubs learned the road was going.

EXHIBIT 06

FOR-2023-31283 · same plan · section 7.1, Public Use and Access

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31283 · same plan · section 7.1, Public Use and Access

Areas they can no longer ski

Under a heading that opens by stating the operation “does not restrict public access in any way,” the plan goes on to record rising snowmobile use “particularly in the vicinity of Silver Cup Ridge” and concludes: “There are some areas that we can no longer ski due to the snowmobile traffic.”

EXHIBIT 07

FOR-2023-31283 · Dave Butler, CMH, to Tracy Ronmark, Director of Authorizations · Nov 2022

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31283 · Dave Butler, CMH, to Tracy Ronmark, Director of Authorizations · Nov 2022

Raised with the person adjudicating the tenure

Writing to the official deciding six of its tenure replacements, CMH lists its grievances: tenure term, wildlife issues, old growth deferrals, and “lack of management of public recreation.” Elsewhere in the same correspondence, “growing unmanaged public recreation” is described as “creating both safety and experiential issues for us.” The sector, he writes, faces “a death by a thousand cuts.”

EXHIBIT 08

FOR-2023-31283 · Ministry of Forests to CMH · 17 Feb 2022

View original PDF ↗
Excerpt from FOR-2023-31283 · Ministry of Forests to CMH · 17 Feb 2022

What the Province asked for in return

The conditions the Ministry proposed attaching to the renewed licences: record every caribou sighting, track all GPS flight data including flight paths and landing locations, report twice yearly, and do not operate within 2,000 metres horizontally or 500 metres vertically of caribou. For the Galena file specifically, a referral recommendation asks that a temporarily closed area in critical caribou winter range become permanently closed — amendable only in the event of extirpation.

The emails

Released with headers intact — sender, recipient, timestamp, subject line. These are the exchanges between the operator and the officials deciding its tenures.

Email 01Dave Butler, CMH → Tracy Ronmark, Director of Authorizations, Ministry of Forests · 15 March 2023View original PDF ↗
Email: Dave Butler, CMH → Tracy Ronmark, Director of Authorizations, Ministry of Forests · 15 March 2023
Dave Butler, Director of Sustainability, CMH — to the official adjudicating six of the company’s tenure replacements.

The header establishes the relationship the rest of this section rests on. CMH’s Director of Sustainability is corresponding directly with the Ministry of Forests Director of Authorizations for the Kootenay-Boundary region — the region containing Trout Lake and Rady Creek — about six Licences of Occupation awaiting decision.

Email 02Butler → Ronmark · 28 November 2022 · forwarded in the same threadView original PDF ↗
Email: Butler → Ronmark · 28 November 2022 · forwarded in the same thread
“I’d like to bring some additional information to your attention as part of your review of these key mid-term replacement applications.”

The long submission. Butler responds point by point, in italics, to the Ministry’s position on tenure term, caribou conditions and flight data. It is a lobbying document in the ordinary sense of the word — an operator putting its case to a decision-maker while a decision is pending.

Email 03Butler → Ronmark · the contradiction paragraphView original PDF ↗
Email: Butler → Ronmark · the contradiction paragraph
“Growing unmanaged public recreation … is creating both safety and experiential issues for us.”

Butler sets out what he calls a contradiction: being asked to do more on stewardship — flight data, greater separation distance from wildlife — at greater cost, while being offered shorter tenures. In the same breath he lists the pressures the company is under, and public recreation is one of them.

Email 04Butler → Ronmark · closing paragraphView original PDF ↗
Email: Butler → Ronmark · closing paragraph
“On almost every front — tenure term, wildlife issues, lack of management of public recreation … we are facing a death by a thousand cuts.”

The closing appeal. “Lack of management of public recreation” sits in a list of grievances put to the person deciding the tenures, alongside a request that she weigh all of it — “not just what you receive from your government colleagues.”

Email 05Lauren Knowlan, Authorizations Specialist, Ministry of Forests → Dave Butler · 17 February 2022View original PDF ↗
Email: Lauren Knowlan, Authorizations Specialist, Ministry of Forests → Dave Butler · 17 February 2022
The Ministry sets out what it wants in return: every caribou sighting logged, all GPS flight paths tracked, and a 2,000-metre exclusion around caribou.

The conditions the Ministry proposed writing into the renewed licences — and, for the Galena file specifically, a referral recommendation that a temporary caribou closure become permanent, amendable only in the event of extirpation. This is the ask that HeliCat had resisted for years, arriving as a tenure condition.

Email 06Jennifer Psyllakis, WLRS → Vera Vukelich, Lynn Brunsdon, Michelle Porter, Ministry of Forests · 17 March 2023View original PDF ↗
Email: Jennifer Psyllakis, WLRS → Vera Vukelich, Lynn Brunsdon, Michelle Porter, Ministry of Forests · 17 March 2023
Subject: “Another mtng between WLRS DM Lori Halls and Adventure Tourism Coalition re adventure tourism policy change response.”

The government side of the same room. Senior officials across two ministries coordinating a briefing note for the Deputy Minister ahead of another meeting with the industry coalition — one of many. No equivalent thread exists for the recreation groups using this terrain, because no equivalent meetings took place.

What the file shows

Through the same years the registry records those meetings, the operator flying Silvercup Ridge was putting a documented commercial case to the Ministry of Forests: public recreation on that ridge was reducing what it could sell, and the sector wanted it managed. That case went to named officials, in writing, while decisions on its licences were pending. The people who use the road were in none of those rooms.

One record would show what the Ministry weighed when it decided this road's future — the Recreation Sites and Trails BC referral response for FSR 0321.02. We have requested it. It has not been released.
08 — The verdict

What the evidence shows

The Province withheld maintenance funding from this class of road for a decade and kept no records of what that did. It refused the road the recreation designation that would have restored the funding — after the community had done everything the agency asked of it. It then produced an unpublished safety opinion to justify removal, on a road where its own surveyor noted a pickup can be driven to the top. It skipped the consultation process it had just run, in full, four kilometres away. And through all of it, the commercial operator behind the same ridge sat in monthly meetings with the deputy ministers and wildlife officials making these calls, while the people who use this road could not get a reply to a ten-thousand-signature petition. That same operator had already told the Ministry, in writing, that snowmobiles from Trout Lake were making Silvercup Ridge less useable.

The Auditor General was clear that none of this was required. There is no trigger for deactivation. There is no timeline. A forest service road can stay exactly where it is, indefinitely, if someone pays to maintain it. Removal is not an obligation. It is a decision — and it can be unmade this week by one instruction from the Minister's office.

This road is not being removed because it is dangerous. It is being removed because it was allowed to become inconvenient.

Rady Creek is one road. But the mechanism that condemned it — no transition pathway, no designation, no consultation, no record — is standard operating procedure for public access across British Columbia.

In this district alone, four more roads are already in the queue. There is no process anywhere in the province for turning a retired industrial road into a managed recreation route. The only tool the Ministry has is the excavator.

The pattern will not stop at Trout Lake unless it is stopped at Trout Lake.

09 — The documentary

Four reasons, checked one at a time

In August 2026 Tyler at LetsGetLost spent two days on this road and in Trout Lake,
checking the government's four stated reasons against what residents, prospectors and
club members told him — and against records obtained under freedom of information.

Government Doesn't Want us Here… We Tried to Find Out Why — Tyler, LetsGetLost, August 2026. Published independently. 31 minutes. Watch on YouTube ↗ · Subscribe to the channel ↗

The four official reasons

What the Ministry has said, and what the film found when it checked.

Official 01

Public safety

An engineer identified the road as a landslide hazard. The film drove the full length looking for evidence and found no major washouts, no obvious slope failures, no compromised sections.

“A convenient lie.”Thomas Gardner · Taranis Resources
wilderness first responder
Report never released
Official 02

There is no money

The Ministry cites a lack of maintenance funding. The Auditor General confirms the shortfall is real — and that it was a provincial allocation decision, not a local one.

Districts received 14% of what they asked for.Auditor General of BC · 2019/20
Verified — Auditor General
Official 03

Caribou habitat

The road sits inside a Government Actions Regulation area for the Central Selkirk herd. The film notes that while terrain closed for caribou, the Ministry approved new cut blocks in the same habitat.

“That’s not the deal we made.”Trout Lake Recreational Club
on the 2021 stewardship agreement
Cut block figure unverified
Official 04

Forestry has finished

Once industrial use ends, the road is surplus. The film sets this against the mineral tenures, Crown Grants and year-round public use that still depend on the corridor.

“There’s people up there right now.”Interviewed on the road, August 2026
Verified — Ministry policy

And six the government has never put in writing

Raised by the film, by residents, and by the documents themselves.

Unstated 01

The reasons keep changing

The film's central finding. Freedom of information records and interviews show four rationales in circulation at once — safety, money, caribou, end of forestry — with which one you hear depending on which official you reach.

“Three or four different excuses. None of them worked.”Trout Lake resident
Consistent with the record
Unstated 02

The trails the club registered

In 2017 the Trout Lake club mapped and registered its riding areas with Recreation Sites and Trails BC and handed over a list of trails. Members say those trails were then deactivated one by one, and that a Ministry letter records RSTBC raising no concern about Rady.

“They decided it wasn’t a high recreation value place. We just weren’t important.”Trout Lake Recreational Club
Records requested
Unstated 03

Conservation targets

Interviewees raise the province's commitment to conserve 30% of British Columbia by 2030, and argue a shift of that scale should not proceed without consultation. One traces his family to the Highland Clearances and sees the same instrument at work.

“Another stroke of the pen, displacing the people who made their lives here.”Thomas Gardner · Taranis Resources
Interviewee argument
Unstated 04

Sterilised land value

A conservancy limits what tenure holders can do while they still owe annual work commitments. Without road access, holders eventually surrender their claims — and a government that later wants the land no longer has anyone to expropriate or compensate.

Give up the claim, and there is nobody left to compensate.The film's summary of the mechanism
Interviewee argument
Unstated 05

Commercial recreation

Records obtained under freedom of information show an operator's representative raising the cost of added stewardship obligations, and identifying growing unmanaged public recreation as a problem for the business. The filmmaker says plainly he found no evidence linking this to the Rady decision.

Those records are now published in full.Section 07 — the file
Primary records obtained
Unstated 06

The mines nobody cleaned up

Historic workings across this area have never been properly remediated. Removing the road removes the only way to get equipment in.

“You can’t say you’re protecting the environment while leaving toxic mine sites to leach into the streams.”Interviewed in the film
Interviewee argument
The film ends without a definitive answer, because the documents that would give one have not been released.
Those documents are listed at the foot of this page.
10 — The record

Timeline

Every entry is sourced. The full document register and outstanding records requests are at the foot of this page.

1895–1915
The Silver Cup mine produces about 1.5 million ounces of silverMiners cut the grade that becomes Rady Creek. Trout Lake peaks above a thousand people; by 1959 there are seven.
BC Geological Survey
2008
An internal ministry audit finds road records informal and inconsistentThe same finding will recur twelve years later. Nothing changes in between.
Cited in Auditor General, 2020
2017
The Trout Lake club registers its trails with Recreation Sites & Trails BCA mapping team attends. The club hands over its trail list and receives the province's first new-style trailhead signs. Trails on that list are subsequently deactivated, one by one.
Trout Lake Recreational Club account, on camera · original records requested
2017–2020
Districts receive 20%, then 15%, then 14% of their maintenance requestsThe South Area receives 36% of its capital-road ask. $3.1M of that ask was recreation access. $8.9M in high-priority work goes unfunded province-wide.
Auditor General of BC, Exhibits 8 & 9
Nov 2020
The Auditor General finds the Ministry is not maintaining roads to its own policyAnd that no trigger or timeline for deactivation exists — roads can stay open indefinitely if maintained as wilderness roads.
Management of Forest Service Roads
Dec 2020
Mar 2021
HeliCat Canada meets the Executive Director for Species at Risk Recovery, twiceAlongside the Deputy Minister and an Assistant Deputy Minister. That executive now runs the region containing Rady Creek.
Lobbyist Registry 1683-4990 · 1683-7662
24 Mar 2021
The clubs sign a Stewardship Management Agreement for caribou recoveryBCSF, the Trout Lake Recreational Club and Arrow Lakes Ridge Riders, with the Province.
BC Snowmobile Federation
~Apr 2021
One month later they learn about the deactivation — from someone elseNot from the Ministry. BCSF's government contact confirms he knew, and supported it.
BC Snowmobile Federation
Aug 2021
The Ministry's position flipsFrom every effort being made to maintain ATV access, to no ATV access remaining.
ATVBC
Apr 2025
The district publishes a full public process — for a different roadFifteen-question FAQ, mailed notices across three years, newspaper advertisement, comment period. Rady Creek gets none of it.
Incomappleux FSR FAQ, file 11250-30/3397
7 Aug 2025
Matthew Yeomans and Stacey Tourout die on Silver Cup RidgeKaslo Search and Rescue respond with two ground teams, a quad team and a helicopter. Rady is the middle of three ways out.
Kaslo SAR · CBC
7 Nov 2025
The deactivation prescription is produced — 79 waypoints over 4,376 mFour prescribe permanent re-contour. At WP74 the surveyor writes: “Can drive pickup to here.”
gov.bc.ca prescription map
6 Jul 2026
BCSF writes to the Minister demanding a pause
BC Snowmobile Federation
8 Jul 2026
Seventy people gather at Trout Lake. The Ministry sends enforcement officersDecision-makers were invited. Natural resource officers attended instead, and told the crowd they were not permitted past the barricade.
Black Press Media
24 Aug 2026
The district page is refreshed. The Rady entry is unchanged.Still filed under upcoming works. Not recorded as complete. The road is still there… for now.
gov.bc.ca, retrieved 24 Aug 2026
11 — The people

Who can stop this

Deactivation is not decided in Victoria. Under the Forest and Range Practices Act it belongs to one official at the district level — and it can be paused from above.

Can pause it
RPHon. Ravi ParmarLegislative Assembly of BC
Hon. Ravi Parmar
Minister of Forests
One instruction ends this
FOR.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Owns RSTBC
TDHon. Tamara DavidsonLegislative Assembly of BC
Hon. Tamara Davidson
Minister of Environment & Parks
Responsible for Recreation Sites & Trails BC — the agency that filed no concern
ENV.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Regional
RLRuss LarocheRegional Executive Director
Russ Laroche
Regional Executive Director, Kootenay-Boundary. Formerly Executive Director, Species at Risk Recovery
Met by HeliCat Canada twice while holding the species-at-risk file
Registry 1683-4990 · 1683-7662
Signs the order
CSCharlene StrelaeffDistrict Manager, Selkirk
Charlene Strelaeff
District Manager, Selkirk Natural Resource District
The statutory decision-maker
FRPA s.22.2 · FPPR s.82
FOR.SelkirkDistrictOffice@gov.bc.ca
250-825-1100
Still unnamed
? name withheld
The Nelson engineer
Authored the prescription and the landslide-hazard opinion. Neither has been published
Referred to by role. Never named.
Name requested
Still unnamed
? name withheld
The RSTBC representative
Whose referral response determined whether this road could receive maintenance funding
Filed no concern. Never named.
Record requested
On your side
SMScott McInnis MLALegislative Assembly of BC
Scott McInnis
MLA, Columbia River–Revelstoke
Tabled the petition; proposes interim wilderness road status
Scott.McInnis.MLA@leg.bc.ca
12 — The fix

There is no way to turn a road into a trail

This is the gap underneath everything on this page. When a Forest Service Road stops being needed for logging, British Columbia has exactly one tool for it: deactivation. There is no mechanism to hand that same corridor to Recreation Sites and Trails BC and keep it open as a managed recreation route.

Not a slow mechanism. Not an underfunded one. None. The Ministry of Forests cannot transfer a road footprint into the recreation system, because no pathway to do it has ever been built.

So when the industrial use ends, the only question a district can answer is how much of the road to destroy. And the Ministry told the Trout Lake club exactly what that means in practice: the road must be deactivated first — the slope returned to its pre-road condition — after which the club is welcome to apply for a permit and rebuild access over the same ground.

The BC Snowmobile Federation has put a four-point proposal in front of the Minister of Forests. It is not a demand to keep every road open forever. It is a request to build the missing pathway, and to use Rady Creek to build it.

Industrial use ends the licensee walks away Transition to a managed recreation trail THIS PATHWAY DOES NOT EXIST Access kept, liability managed community stewardship, funded maintenance Deactivation the only tool a district actually has Access gone. Permanently. rebuild only by permit, at private cost
Both branches were once possible in principle. Only one has ever been built into policy. Every road in this position takes the lower branch by default — not because anyone chose it, but because there is nothing else to choose.

What is actually being asked for

The four-point proposal the BC Snowmobile Federation put to the Minister of Forests on 6 July 2026.

ASK 01

Pause the contract

Halt physical work at Rady Creek long enough for a formal cross-ministry transition review — Forests, Environment and Parks, Recreation Sites and Trails BC, local representatives and recreation partners at the same table.

ASK 02

Protect the asset in the meantime

Use a temporary wilderness road designation to hold the corridor legally stable while a permanent transfer framework is built. This is the mechanism MLA Scott McInnis has asked the Legislature to apply.

ASK 03

Make Rady the pilot

This corridor has no bridges and no large culverts — the lowest-risk footprint in the province on which to design a standardised transition tool. Build the pathway here, then apply it everywhere.

ASK 04

The community pays for the evidence

The Federation and the Trout Lake club have offered to fund an independent geotechnical assessment themselves, removing the cost and the administrative burden from the Ministry entirely.

Why it has not happened

Nobody owns the problem

The road sits with the Ministry of Forests. The recreation designation sits with Environment and Parks. Neither ministry has authority to complete a transfer on its own, and no process compels them to sit down together.

There is no money attached

Even a road that clears the recreation designation enters a funding pool that met 14% of district requests in 2019/20. A pathway with no budget behind it moves roads from one queue into another.

Liability has no landing place

The Province holds the risk until it deactivates. Clubs have offered to assume liability and carry insurance — but there is no instrument to accept that offer, so the safest administrative act remains destruction.

What happens if nothing changes

Rady Creek is not an outlier. It is the front of a queue — and every road behind it will be resolved the same way, for the same reason, unless the pathway gets built.

In the Selkirk district alone, four more roads are already posted or under way. One of them, Heights FSR, carries an explicit note in the Ministry's own listing: there will be no ATV access after completion.

Province-wide the arithmetic is worse. Roughly 58,000 kilometres of Forest Service Road exist; around 12,000 carry the capital status that makes them unlikely to be deactivated. The rest sit at the wilderness minimum, and the wilderness minimum does not guarantee that a vehicle can get through.

This is how an adventure tourism economy gets hollowed out. Not by a single decision anyone would defend in public, but by a hundred district-level decisions taken quietly, each one individually reasonable under a policy that offers no alternative. The operators, guides, lodges, fuel stops and repair shops that depend on backcountry access do not lose it in one announcement. They lose one road a year until the trip is no longer worth taking.

Trout Lake has around two dozen residents and three remaining industries — tourism, mineral exploration and recreation. All three run up this road. Communities like it do not recover access once the bench is gone; they simply stop being places people drive to.

The long-term ask

Pause Rady Creek. Build the transition pathway here, on the lowest-risk road in the province, and attach real money to it. Then apply it to the four roads already queued behind this one — and to the thousands of kilometres that will reach the same decision point over the next decade.

None of that happens without a pause first.
The pause is a decision one minister can make this week.
13 — Act

The road is still there… for now

The district page still lists it under upcoming works. A pause is an administrative decision that can be made this week. Here is how to force the question.

01

Email the Minister

Ask for an immediate pause and the release of the safety evidence. Pre-written, addressed to the Minister of Forests, copied to Environment, the local MLA and the district office.

Open the email
02

Sign the petition

The Trout Lake Recreational Club and Arrow Lakes Ridge Riders are demanding a pause and a legal review of how this decision was made.

Sign at Change.org
03

Send us what you have

Photographs from any year. Dates you used the road. Correspondence with the Ministry. Permits, maps, records of maintenance requests. If you were up there, that is evidence.

Submit evidence
04

Ask the district one question

Was a public comment period held for Rady Creek FSR 0321.02, and where is it published? Ask in writing so there is a record, and forward whatever comes back to us.

Email the district office
If you write your own letter, ask for: 1. An immediate pause on irreversible work. 2. Release of the geotechnical, terrain stability and hydrology assessments. 3. Release of the Recreation Sites & Trails BC referral response. 4. A cross-ministry review before access is removed. To: FOR.Minister@gov.bc.ca Copy: ENV.Minister@gov.bc.ca Scott.McInnis.MLA@leg.bc.ca FOR.SelkirkDistrictOffice@gov.bc.ca Form letters get counted. Personal ones get read. The most valuable thing you can add is local knowledge — when you last drove it, what you use it for, what the alternatives are in winter.
14 — Questions

Questions

What does “deactivation” actually mean?

Excavators cut drainage trenches across the road, pull the fill back off the outside edge, and at certain points re-contour the slope to its natural angle. The published prescription for Rady lists 79 waypoints across 4,376 metres. Seventy-five are ditches and pull-backs, which a grader could undo. Four prescribe full re-contour, which nothing undoes.

It also ends the Ministry's obligation to maintain the road and returns the ground to vacant Crown land.

Isn't the road genuinely dangerous?

The Ministry says so and will not show its work. No terrain stability assessment, geotechnical report or hydrology report has been published, and the petitioners say none has been disclosed to them.

What is published is the Ministry's own prescription map, on which its surveyor recorded that a pickup can be driven to the top of the work area. A government that believed it had a landslide on its hands would release the report. This one has had five years.

Isn't this about protecting caribou?

The Central Selkirk herd is genuinely at risk and that deserves to be taken seriously. But caribou is one of four reasons the Ministry has given for Rady, alongside safety, funding and the end of logging — and which one you hear depends on who you ask.

The clubs signed a caribou stewardship agreement in March 2021 and learned a month later, from a third party, that the road was going. Meanwhile the commercial heli-ski operation flying the same terrain has faced no equivalent restriction — only a request for its flight data, which its industry association resisted.

Does the Province actually have to remove it?

No. The Auditor General of British Columbia found in November 2020 that there is no trigger and no timeline for deactivation, and that Forest Service Roads can remain open indefinitely if maintained as wilderness roads — the minimum standard applied to every such road in the province.

The Ministry must maintain a road until it deactivates it. Deactivation is the escape hatch that opens when the maintenance money is gone.

Why does “high-value recreation” matter so much?

Because it is the whole game. The funding policy ranks maintenance money in three tiers, and the third is high-value recreation sites as designated by the Recreation Sites and Trails BC representative. Roads that clear a tier become capital roads, which the Auditor General describes as unlikely to be deactivated and requiring continual maintenance.

Nobody lives on Rady Creek, so tiers one and two were closed. The recreation tier was the only door — and RSTBC filed no concern when the deactivation was circulated.

Was there really no public comment period?

We have found no record of one — nothing on the district page, nothing in the coalition's material, nothing in any source we have reviewed. We have asked the Ministry directly and filed for the records. Whatever comes back will be published here.

What is not in doubt is the comparison. The same district, in the same years, ran a documented public process for the Incomappleux road four kilometres away.

What happens if it goes?

Silvercup Ridge drops to two access routes, both at the far ends. Anyone in difficulty up there reaches one of those ends or waits for a helicopter. Mineral tenure and Crown Grant holders lose vehicle access to claims they have spent decades proving up. The winter route into Foggy Day is gone. Trout Lake loses the road all three of its remaining industries depend on.

The Trout Lake club has offered to take the corridor on — assume the liability, carry the insurance, manage it. The Ministry's answer was that the road must be destroyed first, after which the club is welcome to apply for a permit and rebuild it.

How do I check any of this myself?

Please do. The Auditor General's report is at bcauditor.com. The prescription map and district road page are on gov.bc.ca. The lobbyist registry is at lobbyistsregistrar.bc.ca — free, searchable, and every figure cited here carries an activity number.

If you find an error, tell us. We will correct it and log the correction in the open.

15 — Changelog

What changed, and when

This file grows. Every addition, correction and withdrawal is dated and sourced here — including our own mistakes.

v1.0
24 Aug 2026
  • Initial publication.
  • District maintenance funding figures 2017/18–2019/20 and South Area capital road breakdown. Auditor General of BC, Management of Forest Service Roads, Nov 2020, Exhibits 8 & 9
  • Finding that no trigger or timeline for deactivation exists. Same report
  • Prescription analysis: 79 waypoints, four re-contour, WP74 annotation. Deactivation Prescription Map, FSR 0321.02, 7 Nov 2025, gov.bc.ca
  • Process comparison against Incomappleux FSR 3397. Incomappleux FSR Deactivation FAQ, Apr 2025, file 11250-30/3397
  • Lobbying registry counts and HeliCat monthly cadence. BC Office of the Registrar of Lobbying, retrieved 24 Aug 2026
  • Recorded that no public comment period for Rady Creek has been located. Records requested from the Ministry
v1.1
25 Aug 2026
  • Added section 07 — the file. Eight exhibits and six emails published from three freedom-of-information response packages totalling 108 pages, requested after reviewing the lobbying registry entries in section 06. FOR-2023-31283 · FOR-2023-31284 · WLR-2024-41783
  • Province requires spatial data and setbacks from mining and forestry; heli-tourism data is voluntary. WLR-2024-41783, meeting note for Minister Cullen, 16 May 2024
  • Province records that HeliCat Canada has not supplied flight path data after several years of asking, and that there is limited evidence of compliance with the 2 km caribou setback. Same note, page 2
  • Ministry states the sector's lack of improvement diminishes the credibility of caribou recovery, and anticipates HeliCat may resume lobbying to block the measures. FOR-2023-31284, Briefing Note for Decision, 1 Feb 2021
  • CMH records Silvercup Ridge runs as less useable due to unregulated snowmobile use from Trout Lake, and areas it can no longer ski. FOR-2023-31283, CMH Galena Management Plan, 15 Jul 2020
  • CMH raises "lack of management of public recreation" with the Director of Authorizations adjudicating its tenure replacements. FOR-2023-31283, Butler to Ronmark, Nov 2022
  • Corrected: premise "Commercial recreation" reclassified from stated as an open question to primary records obtained. The underlying documents are now published rather than described.
  • Six emails published with headers intact, between CMH and the Ministry of Forests Director of Authorizations for Kootenay-Boundary, and between senior officials across two ministries. FOR-2023-31283 pp. 1–6, 84; FOR-2023-31284 p. 12
  • Every exhibit and email now links to the original response package on the Province's open information portal, docs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca.
Open
Requested
  • Public notice, referral and comment records for FSR 0321.02, 2021–2026.
  • The Recreation Sites & Trails BC referral response.
  • Road Engineering Risk Analysis and Maintenance Inspection Reports for 0321.02.
  • Terrain stability, geotechnical and hydrology assessments.
  • The 2017 RSTBC trail list and the deactivation decisions that followed it.
  • The names of the Nelson district engineer and the provincial chief engineer.
  • All referral correspondence for FSR 0321.02, 2019–2026 — the record that would show what was weighed.

How we source this

Everything on this page rests on a government document, a public registry entry, a named news organisation, or an organisation's own published statement. Where an account comes from an interview rather than a record, we say so in the source line.

We publish the conclusions the evidence supports and we name the documents that would settle what it does not. When a record arrives that changes something here, we change it and log it.

16 — About

Who is behind this

SaveRady.com is published by the Backcountry Coalition — a non-profit working on public land use issues that affect recreational users.

The Coalition was founded in British Columbia and works alongside established groups including the BC Snowmobile Federation, ATVBC, the Four Wheel Drive Association of BC and the Trout Lake Recreational Club. It is not a substitute for any of them. It exists to do the work volunteer boards rarely have capacity for: pulling public records, filing information requests, and publishing what the documents show.

Rady Creek is our first file. It will not be our last.